Pro Kennex 2019 Ki Q+tour Pro 325 Tennis Racquet Review

Our testers appreciated the control and comfort the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) provided on their groundstrokes, only they would have liked a bit more power and a better connection to the ball. "Much similar previous iterations of this racquet, this update felt solid and comfortable when I was swinging away from the baseline," Troy remarked. "It felt plusher and more comfortable than some other racquets I've been hit with recently, which was a nice relief on my arm. When I was taking large swings from the baseline I institute plenty of control to go on my shots within the lines. The spin potential was good compared to other 18x20 cord pattern racquets even though the spacing between the strings wasn't extremely dense. My only knock on this racquet from the baseline was the minimal feedback I was getting from information technology. "The vibrations are and so well dampened that I wasn't getting the kind of feedback that I similar."

As a fan of more traditional player's frames, Chris wasn't completely comfortable with the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325). He said, "I institute a very controlled response from the baseline with this racquet. The dumbo cord pattern and archetype straight beam kept the ability level somewhat depression. I was taking big swings at the ball off both wings and felt like I could swing freely without fear of overhitting. When I set and stepped into the ball I really enjoyed this racquet. However, equally soon as I was pushed deep, stretched wide or forced off balance, I immediately missed the gratis ability of my Babolat Pure Drive Plus. Compared to other actor's racquets at a similar weight, such equally the Volkl V-Sense x Midplus (325) and Wilson Pro Staff 97, the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) offered a more than muted response. The Kinetic technology did an excellent chore of improving condolement, but I found it came at a toll to feel. I would take liked a petty more feedback from the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) on touch shots and when I was trying to determine the corporeality of spin I had on an angle or lob. My backhand was my favored side with this racquet. I was very happy with how I was hitting both my slice and bulldoze backhands. I felt more than dialed in off that wing and did a amend task locating my targets."

Michelle appreciated the comfort of this racquet, only she never got dialed in with her aggressive baseline style. She said, "This wasn't my favorite playtest. I was expecting a traditional soft racquet from ProKennex and that's what I found, but I didn't realize that I wouldn't relish the feel. I but struggled to connect with this racquet. On paper it looked like in that location was no reason for me to not like the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325). The swingweight was where I like it, the headsize was in my wheelhouse and the weight was right. However, the 18x20 string design wasn't my favorite, and the lower stiffness rating wasn't for me. Even though I'm a big hitter I felt like I couldn't get the ball to go anywhere, and because of that I had a tendency to try to hit the ball equally hard as I could instead of but using my normal groundstrokes. The sweetspot felt a bit mushy to me, and I simply never really felt completely connected to the stringbed. This racquet made firm poly strings experience pretty soft, so information technology definitely had an arm-friendly response. I just adopt a bit firmer feel."

Mark, on the other hand, really enjoyed the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) from the baseline. He praised, "Since I've gotten used to playing with my 28-inch length frame I've had a harder fourth dimension playing with shorter racquets. So the new ProKennex Ki+ Q Tour Pro (325) came along. After x swings with this racquet I concluded that I could easily switch to it, at least from a backcourt standpoint. My topspin and piece were effective from anywhere in the courtroom, and I most couldn't believe that this racquet has an 18x20 pattern. Too its tighter cord pattern benefiting me, the overall weight and balance helped make it easier for me to boom my targets off either wing."

Our testers used the exceptional control of the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) to volley finer, and they also found a good blend of stability and maneuverability. Still, the lack of feel was an consequence again. "I appreciated the directional control at internet," Michelle said. "I thought it was pretty easy to block assurance support at that place. I don't have a bunch of touch to begin with, merely the softness of this racquet about left me feeling completely disconnected from the stringbed. I kept it pretty unproblematic with this racquet at cyberspace and didn't attempt anything too cute or fancy."

"I liked the solid response and comfortable feel I got from the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) at the net," Chris commented. "Again, I would take liked a piddling more feel from this racquet, but that was my merely knock. Otherwise, my volleys felt pretty dialed in. The racquet remained solid even when the pace picked upward. I as well enjoyed the style the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) offered some dainty dial on low volleys. I was able to detect depth hands, and I could really punch away my volleys when given fourth dimension."

Marker'due south net game was on point with this racquet. He said, "This was another part of the playtest I loved. Dipping passing shots were consistently met and tamed with an constructive half volley. The Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) never felt unstable. Hitting volleys from a higher point in the air was still effective for me, and even when I hit the brawl out most the rim my volleys were comfy, solid and penetrating."

Troy had a similar experience as the others, maxim, "When I was hit volleys this racquet immune me to put the ball where I wanted information technology inside the courtroom. With the headsize and string pattern being very familiar to me, I felt like I could hit my targets and place my volleys virtually the lines. The weight provided skilful stability, fifty-fifty against heavy shots. The blend of control, stability and maneuverability made this racquet a great doubles stick for me. There was enough mass to become aplenty depth, only at the same time I could easily become this racquet into place to hit quick reaction volleys. The loftier level of dampening felt great on my arm, simply at the same time it removed some of the feel I wanted for my drop volleys and acute angles. I enjoyed how this racquet performed on my volleys equally long as I kept my focus on hit deep in the court at big targets."

Control and spin were the shining attributes of the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) on serve, only many of our testers establish themselves longing for more easy power for their first serves. "I served decently with this racquet," Chris said. "I felt accurate with information technology and also liked the amount of slice I was getting. All the same, I was definitely down on pace. During set play I was struggling to hold serve with the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325), but then held easily for the rest of the ready when I switched back to my Pure Drive Plus. At that place was a large divergence in the amount of footstep I was getting on my serves, and I just couldn't get the ball abroad with the Ki Q+ Tour Pro 325."

Troy used precision and variety to serve effectively during this playtest. He explained, "Focusing on good technique and placement was the cardinal for me beingness successful when serving with the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325). Information technology didn't offer me much in the fashion of easy power, but I loved how I could unload on apartment and spin serves and still maintain command of the ball. I was constructive serving with this racquet by hit the corners of the service box. With the dense string pattern I felt comfy placing my flat first serve consistently. I loved how I could generate a lot of racquet head speed to generate high levels of rotation on my spin serves, while at the aforementioned time maintaining the command to find my targets. With the swingweight being slightly lower than my current racquet, it was easy to pronate my wrist and add together some pace to make up for the lack of the power coming from the frame."

Marking was surprised at how well he served with this racquet. He praised, "The aforementioned fun and effectiveness I had from other areas of the court carried over to my serve. The Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) allowed me to comfortably crank upwardly my serve speeds into the low 100 MPH range. This was another part of the playtest where I was a bit surprised to realize this frame sports an 18x20 pattern, since I don't usually do besides with racquets that have tighter string patterns."

Michelle liked the spin she was getting on her serves, simply she would have liked a bit more ability. She critiqued, "I was missing some raw ability from this softer, control-oriented racquet. Because of that, I was actually trying to hit harder and musculus my first serves at times, which wasn't ideal. I did discover the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) to exist effective on my 2d serves. I had an easy time striking my targets, and I could slide piece serves or hit a kicking serve decently well. I could flatten serves out well, too, just I just wasn't getting the speed I wanted. It definitely provided good directional control and precision, only it lacked some power."

Our playtesters were able to swing large on their returns with the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325) and use the racquet's excellent control to locate their shots effectively. "My return game felt pretty much on betoken with the Ki Q+ Tour Pro (325)," Chris raved. "I liked how easy it was to swing this racquet through contact. It felt fast on the swing, all the same it besides felt solid at contact. Again, comfort was very impressive. I liked the fashion the racquet felt comfy fifty-fifty when strung upward with a firm playing co-poly like Luxilon 4G. I was able to drive through the brawl well, and I liked the way I could redirect footstep with the racquet."

"I loved taking huge rips on my forehand returns because of the maneuverability and the low-powered response," Troy remarked. "Someday the server left the brawl sitting in my wheelhouse I was able to go bigger than usual and the ball was nonetheless landing in the court. No matter how difficult the serve was hitting at me, when I made contact with the ball the experience was nice and plush. On my backhand slice returns I could knife through the brawl and get the ball to land deep in my opponent'south court. The racquet's control allowed me to return serves with adept precision. My forehand return was really clicking with this racquet. Whether I went cross court or down the line, I was hit my returns deep and near the lines with skillful consistency."

"This racquet rapidly became one of my favorite racquets to return serves with," Marking added. "I was able to hit through the brawl more than aggressively instead of merely chipping the serve back into play similar I normally do."

Michelle constitute herself going for a bit besides much on her returns. She said, "I can ordinarily appreciate 18x20 racquets since I tin can overhit returns at times. I did like that I had congenital in control with the dense pattern, but I didn't experience like I was as effective when attacking weak second serves (especially on our slow TW court). Because the racquet is a chip softer and lower powered I found myself overhitting my returns, which resulted in some erratic shots that I shouldn't accept been making. However, precision was expert when I wasn't overhitting -- there were a few returns that I lined up down the line and found success. I wouldn't say this racquet had a bunch of spin potential, which I like at times when returning or rolling balls cross courtroom, only it wasn't too large of an issue. For the virtually part, the Ki Q+ Bout Pro (325) was stable enough to block big serves back, I simply couldn't always block the ball deep enough to exist effective."

lawsonwhiliver.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/racquet_reviews/PKQTPreview.html?from=tenrec

Share this post